Ultimatum to Attorney General James

Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, has penned an exclusive letter to AG James, urging her to completely dismiss the civil fraud case pursued by her office. This case has targeted Trump, his family, and associated businesses, and has resulted in a staggering 4 million judgment against him. Sauer’s request was framed as a means to promote the “greater good of the country.”

“In furtherance of our conversations with your office, we write to request that you completely dismiss the above-referenced case against President Donald J. Trump, his family, and his businesses, and stipulate to vacate the Judgment and dismiss all claims with prejudice,” Sauer stated in his letter.

Recent Legal Developments

The civil fraud judgment, which has placed a significant financial burden on Trump, is currently under appeal. Recent indications from a New York appeals court suggest they are open to potentially overturning the ruling entirely. This favorable feedback comes amidst a series of legal victories for Trump, coordinated by his senior legal adviser Boris Epshteyn.

In a notable recent development, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request to dismiss a related case on the 2020 election—that was approved by Judge Tanya Chutkan—has added momentum to Trump’s continuing battle against legal scrutiny. Additionally, a motion initiated by Trump in the New York v. Trump case met with success when Judge Juan Merchan allowed him to file for dismissal of related charges.

The Argument for Dismissal

Sauer outlined several reasons for the dismissal request, emphasizing that James’ suit is marred by significant legal shortcomings. He pointed out that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations and emphasized that her case lacks any identifiable victims, complaints, or misstatements.

“Instead, President Trump provided clear and unambiguous disclaimers to sophisticated commercial parties who made decisions based on their own due diligence,” Sauer argued. “Every loan and insurance payment was made fully, and either on time or early.”

Furthermore, Sauer stated that Trump’s business endeavors had been met with satisfaction from his partners, who collectively enjoyed over 0 million in profits from their transactions with Trump.

Impact on Business Climate

According to Sauer, the implications of James’ litigation extend beyond Trump himself, creating a chilling effect on businesses operating in New York. He claimed that many businesses are relocating to states with more favorable legal environments due to the perceived risks posed by such lawsuits.

“President Trump is one of the most successful developers in the history of New York,” Sauer noted, highlighting Trump’s contributions to the city’s landscape and economy. “This lawsuit against him vindicates no public purpose.”

Historical Context of Unity

In a bid to invoke a spirit of national healing, Sauer referenced President Abraham Lincoln, who, during times of divisiveness in 1863, urged Americans to set aside their differences. Sauer seeks a similar call to action from AG James, arguing that dismissing the charges would signal a commitment to unity over division.

Sauer closed his appeal with a resonant reminder of Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation, emphasizing the importance of coming together as a nation: “He urged all Americans to fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty hand to heal the wounds of the nation.” This reflection serves as a powerful historical parallel as Trump and his legal team navigate the contentious waters of partisan strife.

Challenges Ahead for Trump

Trump’s legal challenges, however, are compounded by a ruling from Judge Arthur Engoron earlier this year, which found Trump and his organization liable for persistent financial fraud, including falsifying records and inflating asset values. Following these findings, Trump faced an escalating financial penalty that has accrued interest, now tallying approximately 0 million.

Despite these setbacks, Trump’s team maintains a resolute stance, vowing to pursue appeals up to the United States Supreme Court if necessary. Trump’s assertions of having undervalued assets and following standard business practices are bolstered by the testimony of expert witnesses who defended his financial dealings as lawful and transparent.

Expert Opinions Supporting Trump’s Case

Witnesses, including former executives from Deutsche Bank, were introduced by Trump’s defense to showcase that banks viewed Trump as a prime business opportunity. Furthermore, New York University accounting professor Eli Bartov testified that in reviewing Trump’s financial statements, he found no evidence of accounting fraud, reinforcing the stance that Trump’s financial disclosures complied with legal standards.

Bartov’s findings indicated no material misstatements in the financial records at issue, painting a picture of Trump’s dealings as legitimate and above board. “My main finding is that there is no evidence whatsoever of any accounting fraud,” Bartov emphasized during his testimony, highlighting the complexities within the ongoing legal dispute.