Mark Warner Grills Tulsi Gabbard Over Edward Snowden Remarks
On a recent Thursday morning, Virginia Senator Mark Warner, a prominent Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, challenged President Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Tulsi Gabbard. The confrontation centered around Gabbard’s past comments in favor of whistleblower Edward Snowden, raising significant concerns regarding national security and accountability.
Warner’s Tough Questions
“Until you are nominated by the president to be the DNI, you consistently praised the actions of Edward Snowden, someone, I believe, jeopardized the security of our nation and then, to flaunt that, fled to Russia,” Warner stated, probing Gabbard about her previous remarks. He further pointed out her description of Snowden as a “brave whistleblower” and expressed his vehement disagreement with that characterization.
Warner went on to align himself with the sentiments of committee chairman, asserting, “Every member of this committee supports the rights of legal whistleblowers. But Edward Snowden isn’t a whistleblower, and in this case, I’m a lot closer to the chairman’s words where he said Snowden is, quote, ‘an egotistical serial liar and traitor’ who, quote, ‘deserves to rot in jail for the rest of his life.’” He pressed Gabbard with a direct inquiry: “Do you still think Edward Snowden is brave?”
Gabbard’s Response
In defense of her earlier statements, Gabbard acknowledged that while Snowden “broke the law,” she did not endorse the manner in which he leaked classified intelligence. “Mr. Vice Chairman, Edward Snowden broke the law. I do not agree with or support with all of the information and intelligence that he released… There would have been opportunities for him to come to you on this committee, or seek out the IG to release that information,” she asserted.
Gabbard was rapid in her defense, stating that despite the illegal actions taken by Snowden, some vital information regarding government surveillance practices was disclosed. “The fact is, he also, even as he broke the law, released information that exposed egregious, illegal and unconstitutional programs that are happening within our government,” she elaborated.
The Snowdens’ Controversial Act
Snowden, a former IT contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), sparked a national debate in 2013 when he disclosed thousands of classified documents. His revelations led to widespread awareness about the extent of government surveillance on citizens, including the risky practices employed by the NSA. This prompted a discussion about privacy and civil liberties, creating further polarization on the issue of whistleblowing versus national security.
Protecting National Secrets
During her exchange with Warner, Gabbard emphasized the responsibility she would carry if confirmed as the DNI: “In this role that I’ve been nominated for, if confirmed as director of national intelligence, I will be responsible for protecting our nation’s secrets.” She expressed her commitment to develop strategic measures aimed at preventing future leaks akin to Snowden’s. “I have four immediate steps that I would take to prevent another Snowden-like leak,” she assured the committee.
Past Praise for Snowden
Despite the tense exchange in the Senate, Gabbard’s history of comments regarding Snowden is one that underscores the complexity of her stance. In a 2019 appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Gabbard stated, “If it wasn’t for Snowden, the American people would never have learned the NSA was collecting phone records and spying on Americans.” This statement illustrates the dichotomy between her recognition of Snowden’s impact on public awareness and the legal implications of his actions.
The Confirmation Process
Gabbard’s appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee marks a crucial step in her confirmation process as Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence. As the Biden administration navigates issues of intelligence, security, and oversight, Gabbard’s nomination represents a mix of traditional national security concerns and the evolving discourse surrounding whistleblower protections.
In a time where the balance between security and civil liberties is more scrutinized than ever, Gabbard’s past comments and her current stance will likely play a significant role in her confirmation process and future actions, should she be approved for the role.
Fox News Digital’s Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.
