House Ethics Committee to Confront Gaetz Controversy Amid Attorney General Nomination

The political landscape in Washington is set for yet another upheaval as the House Ethics Committee may convene on Wednesday to discuss an ongoing investigation into allegations surrounding now-former Representative Matt Gaetz. This discussion comes on the heels of President-elect Donald Trump selecting Gaetz as the nominee for Attorney General, posing significant implications for the former congressman amidst serious claims of misconduct.

Allegations Resurface

Reports have surfaced that a woman, who claims to have had sexual relations with Gaetz when she was just 17, has come forward to speak with the Ethics Committee. This revelation was reported by ABC News, igniting fresh scrutiny over allegations that have plagued Gaetz for years.

These allegations are part of a broader investigation led by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning accusations of sex trafficking and obstruction of justice. The DOJ has engaged with the now 20-something woman as part of their probe into Gaetz’s activities, which adds another layer of complexity to the current situation.

Shifting Dynamics Post-Resignation

The Ethics Committee’s anticipated meeting last week was derailed when Gaetz abruptly announced his resignation from Congress just two days prior. This unexpected exit has significant implications for the investigation, especially since Gaetz’s departure could allow the Ethics Committee to lose jurisdiction over the case.

Rep. Michael Guest, the chair of the House Ethics Committee, previously expressed that if Gaetz resigned to take up the Attorney General position, the committee would no longer have oversight of the case. “If Mr. Gaetz were to resign because he is taking a position with the administration as the attorney general, then the Ethics Committee loses jurisdiction at that point,” Guest asserted before Gaetz’s resignation. “Once we lose jurisdiction, there would not be a report that would be issued.”

Implications for Confirmation Process

The resignation has opened a new debate among lawmakers, particularly concerning whether the Ethics Committee should release its findings prior to Gaetz’s confirmation hearing for Attorney General. Several Republican senators—who will play a crucial role in determining Gaetz’s confirmation—have called for the report’s release if his vetting process proceeds. This demand stems from a need for transparency amid allegations that involve severe misconduct.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, has echoed this sentiment, advocating for the report’s public release. His spokesperson emphasized that “there is longstanding precedent for releasing ethics investigation materials after a member resigns, whether in the House or Senate.” They argued that Gaetz should not be able to “resign away an ethics investigation involving allegations of grave misconduct, especially when he will be nominated to be our country’s top law enforcement officer.”

Motives Behind Resignation

Amid the swirling controversy, a House Republican, speaking to Politico under condition of anonymity, suggested that Gaetz’s resignation was primarily aimed at obstructing the forthcoming ethics investigation. This claim highlights the political maneuvering that often occurs in such high-profile cases where ethics and legality collide in the political arena.

In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., provided a different narrative during a press conference, stating that Gaetz informed him his resignation was intended to expedite the filling of his House seat via special election. This discrepancy in motives surrounding Gaetz’s departure from Congress raises questions about the political implications of his decision.

Past Investigations and Current Denials

The House Ethics Committee has been investigating Gaetz since 2021. Initial accusations included not just illicit drug use but also sexual relations with a minor, which Gaetz has consistently denied. Despite the serious nature of these allegations, the DOJ ultimately decided not to press charges against him. However, with the spotlight now potentially shifting back to him, the future remains uncertain.

The Speaker’s Stance

Regarding the possible release of the Ethics Committee report, Speaker Johnson has asserted his opinion against it. “The speaker of the House is not involved with those things,” he stated. “I do not believe that that is an appropriate thing… That would open up Pandora’s box, and I don’t think that’s a healthy thing for the institution.” His comments reflect a cautious approach to what could become an incendiary matter within the political realm.

Conclusion

The developments surrounding Matt Gaetz’s allegations and his recent resignation are emblematic of the ongoing tensions and complexities inherent in contemporary politics, particularly when intertwined with ethics investigations. As the House Ethics Committee prepares for a potential meeting, the coming days will be pivotal in determining not only Gaetz’s future but also the implications for governance and accountability within the political system.

Fox News’ Daniel Scully contributed to this report.