Army sec nominee questions whether military pilots should do flight training near Washington airport

Army sec nominee questions whether military pilots should do flight training near Washington airport



Tragic Helicopter Collision Raises Serious Safety Questions

Tragic Helicopter Collision Raises Serious Safety Questions

Army Secretary Nominee Daniel Driscoll Questions Training Practices after Fatal Incident

During a recent confirmation hearing at the Senate Armed Services Committee, Army secretary nominee Daniel Driscoll expressed significant concerns regarding the appropriateness of Army helicopter training missions in high-traffic airspace. His comments came in response to a tragic collision that occurred over the Washington D.C. area on Wednesday, raising alarms about the potential preventability of such accidents.

“A Preventable Accident”

In his opening remarks, Driscoll, a seasoned Army veteran, lamented the incident, stating, “It’s an accident that seems to be preventable.” He emphasized the need for a reassessment of risk-taking in training scenarios, particularly in congested airspaces such as that surrounding Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. “There are appropriate times to take risk and inappropriate times to take risk,” Driscoll asserted. “I think we need to look at where is an appropriate time to take training risk, and it may not be at an airport like Reagan.”

Details of the Collision

The unfortunate event involved an American Airlines flight carrying 64 people that was arriving from Wichita, Kansas. It collided with an Army Sikorsky H-60 Black Hawk helicopter just moments before the plane was scheduled to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia. Unfortunately, it is believed that no one aboard the helicopter survived the crash.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later revealed that the three soldiers aboard the helicopter were part of a “fairly experienced crew” performing a “required annual night evaluation.” This has raised further questions about the adequacy of training environments given the complex aviation logistics surrounding the busy D.C. airspace.

Political Reactions to the Incident

Former President Donald Trump voiced his frustration in a blunt Truth Social post, calling the crash “a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented.” He pointed out critical issues surrounding the incident, emphasizing that the airplane was on a “perfect and routine line of approach to the airport,” while the helicopter was on a collision course with the aircraft.

Trump questioned the control tower’s response, stating, “The lights on the plane were blazing, why didn’t the helicopter go up or down, or turn? Why didn’t the control tower tell the helicopter what to do instead of asking if they saw the plane?” His remarks highlight a growing concern regarding communication protocols between air traffic control and military aircraft.

Regulatory Challenges at Ronald Reagan National Airport

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport has long been the subject of scrutiny due to its limited runway length and complicated flight logistics near sensitive airspace around the Pentagon, the White House, and the Capitol. Despite these challenges, Congress approved additional flight slots for the airport as part of its Federal Aviation Administration bill for 2024, including the flight from Wichita that was involved in the collision.

Despite the complexities, lawmakers have advocated for maintaining operational capacity at the airport due to its unparalleled convenience for travelers visiting the nation’s capital.

Commitment to Safety and Future Training Assessments

In light of the recent tragedy, Secretary nominee Driscoll promised to rigorously evaluate Army training practices to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again. “We’re gonna have to work together to make sure that never happens again,” he declared, reiterating the need to assess what training is necessary, especially given the Army’s increasing reliance on its vertical lift aircraft.

Communications Breakdown in Air Traffic Control

According to audio recordings from air traffic control, moments before the crash, an air traffic controller had asked the helicopter crew whether they had the arriving airplane in sight. The controller then issued a directive, stating “PAT 25 pass behind the CRJ,” presumably instructing the helicopter to yield to the Bombardier CRJ-701 twin-engine jet that was approaching. Disturbingly, there was no response from the helicopter, leading to the collision shortly after.

Military helicopters commonly transit through D.C. airspace to transport high-ranking government officials across the Potomac River into the city. However, it was confirmed that no such officials were on board the downed Black Hawk during this incident.

Call for Comprehensive Review

As the investigation into the crash continues, authorities are expected to delve deeply into the circumstances surrounding the incident, including the altitude and flight path of the military helicopter at the time. The outcome of this investigation may prompt changes in policies regarding military training within congested airspaces, thereby ensuring the safety of both military and commercial aviation.

With increased concerns over aviation safety spurred by this tragic incident, there is an urgent need for stakeholders in both civil and military aviation sectors to collaborate and redefine guidelines for operational training protocols in congested airspaces, ensuring that similar accidents can be forestalled in the future.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Army sec nominee questions whether military pilots should do flight training near Washington airport

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *