California school official compared ‘Save Girls Sports’ shirt to swastika, rebuked girls wearing it: lawsuit

California school official compared 'Save Girls Sports' shirt to swastika, rebuked girls wearing it: lawsuit



High School Athletes Sue California School District Over T-Shirt Controversy

High School Athletes Sue California School District Over T-Shirt Controversy

EXCLUSIVE: Two high school cross-country runners and their families have initiated a lawsuit against a California school district, claiming that their “Save Girls Sports” T-shirts were unjustly equated to a swastika.

The Plaintiffs’ Stand

Kaitlyn and Taylor, athletes from Martin Luther King High School, donned T-shirts featuring slogans such as “Save Girls’ Sports” and “It’s Common Sense. XX ≠ XY” during a competitive season. Their actions were a response to an incident involving a transgender student who had not met key varsity eligibility standards but was nonetheless placed on the varsity team, displacing Taylor from her position.

“My initial reaction was like, I was really surprised because it was like, why is this happening to me?” Taylor shared in an interview, expressing her confusion over being sidelined despite her consistent attendance and hard work. “There’s a transgender student on the team. Why am I getting displaced when I worked so hard and gone to all of the practices, and this student has only attended a few?”

The Controversy Blossoms

As the girls wore their shirts, school officials reportedly mandated their removal or covering, labeling the shirts as creating a “hostile” environment. Allegedly, the officials compared the display of their apparel to wearing a swastika in the presence of Jewish students, a comparison that Kaitlyn deemed “hard to hear.” She emphasized that their intention was not to propagate hate but to highlight a cause they are passionate about: safeguarding women’s sports.

While the school has taken issue with the girls’ messaging, it has permitted the transgender athlete to wear “trans pride” bracelets and has allowed the display of LGBTQ pride flags on campus, adding to the complexity of the situation.

Details of the Engagement

The transgender runner, who displaced Taylor, had recently transferred from a different high school where they broke a record in the girls’ cross-country team. The lawsuit underscores the claims that Taylor, referred to in the complaint as T.S., was an established member of the girls’ varsity team since August 2024 but was relegated to junior varsity status in order to accommodate the new athlete for crucial competitions tied to college recruitment prospects.

Legal Claims and Implications

Representing the girls is attorney Julianne Fleischer from Advocates for Faith and Freedom, who states that the lawsuit includes allegations of violations of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, as well as Title IX protections. Fleischer argues that the school district’s actions created an unfair environment that disregarded the hard work and dedication displayed by the athletes. She noted, “Typically, multiple factors, beyond race times, are considered for varsity selection on the cross-country team,” asserting that Taylor’s commitment was overlooked without sufficient explanation from the district.

In October, the Title IX coordinator, Bethany Scott, reached out to Taylor’s mother about an investigation into the situation. However, by early November, the district shifted the classification of the Title IX complaint to a confidential personnel matter, claiming it did not arise from sex-based discrimination.

If the Tide Turned

The rising discourse surrounding the rights of female athletes advocating against the inclusion of transgender students in women’s sports frames this lawsuit within a broader national trend. Fleischer remarked on the increasing voices of young women who are challenging policies that allow biological males to join their teams. There is hope that a shift in legislative or administrative approach could lead to more viable protections for female athletes under Title IX.

Under the current Biden-Harris administration, Title IX was expanded to include protections against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. This move has been met with scrutiny, particularly highlighted by a Supreme Court ruling that rejected one of President Biden’s proposals to permit biological men in women’s facilities, which could have met significant resistance at the state level.

The Future of Women’s Sports

As discussions unfold, incoming President-elect Donald Trump has indicated intentions to roll back some of these policies to protect women’s sports. These developments are pivotal as they may influence the future landscape of women’s athletics across the country.

Fox News Digital has reached out for comments from both the Riverside Unified School District and Martin Luther King High School but has yet to receive any responses.

This ongoing case highlights the significant tensions surrounding gender identity and women’s sports, illustrating the complex nature of advocacy, rights, and contention facing high school athletics today.

California school official compared 'Save Girls Sports' shirt to swastika, rebuked girls wearing it: lawsuit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *